Cameron Waldrop
They state the case that: “the $69 billion deal, Microsoft’s largest ever and the largest ever in the video gaming industry, would enable Microsoft to suppress competitors to its Xbox gaming consoles and its rapidly growing subscription content and cloud-gaming business.”
Phil Spencer announced back in October that Xbox had every intention to bring Activision franchises, such as Call of Duty, to the Game Pass service after the deal had been finished. With this new wrinkle, it looks like that could take a bit longer, if ever. His direct quote was:
While there’s nothing necessarily stopping Microsoft from getting Activision Blizzard titles onto Game Pass if this acquisition does dissolve into nothing, there is a problem with that. If Microsoft and Activision Blizzard end up as different entities, the latter wouldn’t have any reason to give up their games for free. It can’t possibly be cheap to make a deal over a franchise as big as Call of Duty or Diablo, so it’s entirely possible that it would never happen.
Microsoft has made it clear that they don’t intend to buckle under the FTC’s suit, with president Brad Smith posting two tweets confirming an intent to fight.
Microsoft has been doing its best to show that this deal won’t cause an imbalance in the industry, reaffirming commitments to keeping Call of Duty on PlayStation and Steam. They recently announced that a partnership will be restarted with Nintendo to bring Call of Duty to the Switch console as well.
Mass Layoffs at Microsoft Heavily Impact Starfield & Halo Devs How to Earn Overwatch 2 Coins For Free Through Microsoft Rewards 6 New Year’s Resolutions Microsoft Needs to Keep in 2023 Microsoft Flight Simulator “Flow” Announced; Canberra, Cincinnati, Brest, & Christchurch Airports Get Screenshots & Video Microsoft Flight Simulator Piper PA-28 Archer II Gets New Screenshots; Porta Westfalica Airport Announced
